29 November 2022
  • 12:16 pm علیشا، والد کے انتقال کے بعد رکشا چلاکر گھر کا سہارا بننے والی باہمت لڑکی
  • 12:15 pm In Laxmi Singh, UP gets 1st woman Police Commissioner in a major reshuffle
  • 12:01 pm ECP rejects Imran Khan’s appeal in conduct violation case
  • 12:01 pm اعظم سواتی کے جسمانی ریمانڈ میں توسیع
  • 11:46 am Watch video: Elderly besties reunite after years, video leaves internet emotional
Choose Language
 Edit Translation
My-Ads
Spread the News

China imposed a sweeping national security law on Hong Kong Tuesday, dramatically tightening its grip on the semi-autonomous city in a historic move decried by Western nations as a threat to the financial hub’s freedoms.

Described by Beijing as a “sword” hanging over the heads of those endangering national security, the law took effect hours after it was signed by President Xi Jinping and just six weeks since it was first unveiled.

Fed up with pro-democracy protests that rocked the city last year,
China’s top lawmaking body enacted the legislation following closed-door
deliberations that kept details secret until its passage.

The law gives Beijing jurisdiction over “very serious” national
security crimes, with offenders facing up to life in prison, according
to the text published late Tuesday.

The controversial law also empowers China to set up a national
security agency in the city, staffed by officials who are not bound by
local law when carrying out duties.

The new suite of powers radically restructures the relationship
between Beijing and Hong Kong, toppling the legal firewall that has
existed between the city’s independent judiciary and the mainland’s
party-controlled courts.

“It marks the end of Hong Kong that the world knew before,” prominent
democracy campaigner Joshua Wong tweeted as his political party
Demosisto announced it was disbanding.

“With sweeping powers and ill-defined law, the city will turn into a #secretpolicestate.”

Some Hong Kongers responded by deleting Twitter accounts and scrubbing other social media platforms.

In contrast, former city leader Leung Chun-ying took to Facebook to
offer bounties of up to HK$1 million ($130,000) for anyone who could
help secure the first prosecutions under the new legislation or track
down people who have recently fled the city.

Twenty-seven countries, including Britain, France, Germany and Japan,
urged Beijing to “reconsider the imposition” of the legislation, saying
in a statement to the UN Human Rights Council that it “undermines” the
city’s freedoms.

The move has also added fuel to tensions between Beijing and Washington, where condemnation of the move crossed the aisle.

Top Democrat Nancy Pelosi said its “brutal purpose” was to “frighten, intimidate & suppress the speech of Hong Kongers,” and Republican Mitt Romney tweeted that his “heart aches for the people of Hong Kong. Any semblance of freedom and autonomy has vanished.”

As part of the 1997
handover from Britain, Hong Kong was guaranteed certain freedoms — as
well as judicial and legislative autonomy — for 50 years in a deal
known as “One Country, Two Systems.”

The formula helped to cement the city’s status as a world-class
business hub, bolstered by a reliable judiciary and political freedoms
unseen on the mainland.

Critics have long accused Beijing of chipping away at that status,
but they describe the new security law as the most brazen move yet.

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson said he was “deeply concerned”
and that London would scrutinise the law “to understand whether it is in
conflict” with the handover agreement.

The law bans four types of national security crimes: subversion,
secession, terrorism and colluding with foreign forces to endanger
national security.

The text gave three scenarios in which China might take over a
prosecution — complicated foreign interference cases, “very serious”
cases and when national security faces “serious and realistic threats.”

Cases can be passed to mainland China, with the Supreme People’s
Procuratorate and the Supreme Court designating the judicial authorities
handling them.

Lead perpetrators and serious offenders can receive 10 years to life
in prison for engaging in one of the national security crimes.

The law also said certain national security cases could be held
behind closed doors without juries in Hong Kong if they contained state
secrets, although the verdict and eventual judgments would be made
public.

“It’s a fundamental change that dramatically undermines both the local and international community’s confidence towards Hong Kong’s ‘One Country, Two Systems’ model and its status as a robust financial centre,” Hong Kong political analyst Dixon Sing told AFP.

On the mainland, national security laws are routinely used to jail critics, especially for the vague offence of “subversion.”

Beijing and Hong Kong’s government reject those allegations.

They have said the law will only target a minority of people, will
not harm political freedoms in the city and will restore business
confidence after a year of historic pro-democracy protests.

“I urge the international community to respect our country’s right to
safeguard national security and Hong Kong people’s aspirations for
stability and harmony,” Hong Kong city leader Carrie Lam told the UN
Human Rights Council in a video message on Tuesday.

Millions took to the streets last year, while a hard core of
protesters frequently battled police in often violent confrontations
that saw more than 9,000 arrested.

Hong Kong has banned protests in recent months, citing previous
unrest and the coronavirus pandemic, although local transmissions have
ended.

Some Western nations warned of potential repercussions ahead of the security law’s passing.

However, many are also wary of incurring Beijing’s wrath and losing lucrative access to the mainland’s huge economy.

“We deplore this decision,” said European Council head Charles Michel.

Washington — which has embarked on a trade war with China — has
said the security law means Hong Kong no longer enjoys sufficient
autonomy from the mainland to justify special status.

The United States on Monday ended sensitive defence exports to Hong
Kong over the law, prompting China to threaten unspecified
“countermeasures.”

Abdul Gh Lone

RELATED ARTICLES